>>3185311Ok, you want a list? here we go
>skin tonesno treatment, the textures are bad. seem cold
>eyes and glassesHey, I can see you. You can photoshop that out of the way
>coloursas he implied, he tried to copy and to be unoriginal. the blues are off, the magentas and purples are off
>no flashhe should've shot one to avoid ISO 1600. btw, did you add grain to your photo into your post? because that's not what a D810 1600 ISO looks like.
>Bokehyou got saved there not because you, but because your 105mm1.4N soft transitions
>focuson eyes, it's correct, but again, shot with a fucking flash so you can get her nose on focus, and her bun. both are shitty in this photography. Her mouth would be a very interested subject in this photography, but it's also out of focus
You used the newest Lightroom CC Classic to make your photo looks worse than a SOOC with the same settings you had used!
People here using Canons can manage to take better portraits. because at least they know how to use it
also >> Aperture Priority
really? for indoor portraits?
