>>3190554Ehhhhh depends my dude.
When I did the first book, everyone that volunteered did their part on time. Maybe just 1 guy took a bit longer to say yes or no, but that was because of tests or something. But I was pleasantly surprised.
Then again, who knows what the help this year would be like.
>and a name if they so chooseCareful, there is a dude who will complain for years if you get his name wrong.
>>3190784If you choose to do January 5th, you will get A LOT of people wanting to submit past that deadline. Even when I put the deadline to January 20th, there were still people submitting late.
>>3190785This. The reason the past books have actually sold like shit is due to too many submissions/pages which makes it very expensive and no one wants to pay $100 USD for a shitty blurb book.
>>3191153Glad to see you're still around and submitting, always looked forward to your submissions.
>>3191233When I did the curators edition or whatever, everyone had to create a brand new flickr account with "Anon" as the name and random numbers afterwards. This kept everyone anonymous.
Then you set up a private group, invite them into the group and make it so only administrators can invite people into the group. then you upload the photos to this flickr group and every curator
has to give their opinion on wether the photo should make it into the book or not, usually with a brief explanation.
