>>3226393here's mine:
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/pedrcruzall film, most mf, mostly old stuff
not very organized but I think the best ones are there
looking forward for my new scanner so I can upload new ones
>>3226628some nice nature stuff there
>>3226674can definitely see an improvement on your pics
however I think they're lacking subject-wise, anon
>>3226774great mountain ranges, 10/10 would trekk
these are great:
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/124066048@N02/26992803282/> https://www.flickr.com/photos/124066048@N02/26992803952/> https://www.flickr.com/photos/124066048@N02/30001625306/> https://www.flickr.com/photos/124066048@N02/26992803282/there are some that are good but way overdone, imo, like the one you posted and this one:
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/124066048@N02/30573794275/>>3226830confirmed for great looks, bland pics
>>3226885you can see the idea, it's nice but the pics are not very good
it looks like you spend too much time editing for 'that look' but haven't found it yet
maybe using shortcuts like chromes (fuji provia) or even negative (ektar) would help you getting this balance
keep strong, anon
>>3227469looks like beginner stuff
keep going, anon
>>3227518did not expect those nudes
I think it looks nice, even though that's not my thing
your colors are looking good, even on digital
especially on this one, compared to the one similar:
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/symbolicinteraction/25762983938/the indoors pics are lacking a bit but I guess it's that natural settings always more interesting as a background
btw I'm in love with this girl
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/symbolicinteraction/38583160362/>>3227631>>3227528>https://www.flickr.com/photos/linebrell/>Makes me look forward to visiting St. Petersburg soon.same here
one tip, I guess you could expand those shadows and mid-highlights a lot, to get more pop out of pics