>>3235484Would you say the K-3 II would be better than the D7200? As new, the Nikon is 200$ cheaper, and I haven't heard the best of Pentax glass. It's about the same price as the D7500.
>>3235595I've done so much research and haven't even come close to figuring out what I want. I've mainly looked at D7200 with a Sigma 17-50 f/2.8, or with an 18-300, or even sigma 18-35 1.8 art, but that one seems to have focusing problems with D7XX bodies. I've enjoyed using Canon 5d mk3 (that I have the chance to get for $1300 used in good condition.) But I am also tempted by the ergonomics and features of the Pentax and the same + the viewfinder and color rendition of Fuji's, like the X-T20 and X-T2. But I haven't even researched all the good lens options for those cameras. But with so many good options I might as well just follow your advice...
>>3235726X-T1 or XT-20?
I am really loving the dials and large viewfinder of the Fujis. They are also the sexiest system of all the ones I'm considering. Pretty much the only mirrorless I've really wanted to have too.
However the Sony A6300 seems to be better than the XT-20 in almost everything and while I'm not the biggest fan of A6XX's design and lens selection I can't deny the fact they are strong competitors to Fuji's mid and high end X series cams. Though, regardless, if I had to choose I'd still get an XT-20 or XT-2 instead of a6000/a6300.
I could get a full frame body, but then would a 50 mm prime be enough to take advantage of that sensor? Because that's all I'd have money for in the beginning.
Also, I can't buy a new FF body so it'll have to be used for sure.
I'd really prefer not start researching m43 cameras because then I'd be even more lost because surely they have some advantages as well.
