>>3237004I have the option of seeing it if I drum scan it, which is expensive but very very possible with medium format. Especially shooting 6x7 or 6x9. 6x9 is going to be over two and a half times the resolution of a full frame digital shot, and with slow quality film like Velvia 50 and a sharp lens it'll probably resolve even better than that.
But the point is as
>>3237008 said. It's fun. When each shot costs money, you think more about your shots. When shooting medium, especially if you have 10 or 8 exposures PER ROLL, you are not going to waste 2 bucks on a snapshit. You quickly learn to wait out mediocre moments for the decisive ones. And you can do that with digital, but I personally cheapen the impact of the shutter button and end up trying a bunch of stupid pictures and get distracted from my goal. But I definitely love digital too, I like the instant gratification and experimentation I get from it. That's definitely useful. In fact I always bring my digital DSLR with me while doing film.
