>>3236803I guess the picture has potential but the scene doesn't seem that interesting, neither do the people, the colors or anything else in the picture. better than the snap shits of
>>3236821>>3236822>>3236823>>3236825etc.
>>3236853that's not arty, that's nothing. Half of the frame is literally empty, the other half is a point of literally 0 interest.
>>3236956camera shake, delete
>>3236977I dig the colors, the scene also has a bit of something surreal to it
>>3236982well done to use the snow as a leading line in the background and creating that contrast between cold/warm and sharp/hazy
>>3237007eh, it's just clouds. The subject are underexposed leaves
>>3237032could try a square crop since the foreground is a bit distracting
>>3237035i don't even know m8. The subject is cut off, there is nothing of interest at all in the picture
>>3237079it's umm okay? the composition is decent, the sky is obviously the point of interest and you did a good job of placing that and the moon in the image. The issue is, a sky itself is very rarely enough to warrant interest, so the foreground has to go with it. In this case the foreground is just suburbia
>>3237095seems like a creepshot taken without much thought. at least the colors are nice
>>3237125>>3237126>>3237129pretty well exposed between whites, greys and blacks. First seems more like a shot of friends, two has a lot of dead empty space on the right. The last one is definitely the best one
>>3237144the out of focus part in the foreground kind of ruins this shot. get lower or make sure to get everything in focus
>>3237148the light is decent but the background is way too busy
>>3237158now that's a pretty decent shot. Great placement of the cross, great mood with the snow flying around the frame. gj
>>3237174nice colors and well balanced composition, except for those twigs in the foreground. a bit distracting
>>3237178if it wasn't a double exposure in the reflections, the shot would work better imo.
