>>3247926They look fine other than being out of focus and the a6 is also available used for around $350. If you're going to be a hipster don't be an imbecile as well
>>3247929Great timing. Not using the correct exposure to put movement in feet is such a common mistake in street photography and I'm glad to see someone getting it right. Your focus is too close here but the concept works
>>3247936Whereas this one feels staged and kitschy. Try someone walking sideways instead. Focus and aperture are actually on point here though
>>3247939One of your stronger images and the aperture is about right, you're only limited by the lens/camera here
>>3247941Doesn't really need to exist. If you're putting light trails against a pretty building then don't include busy brickabrack
Over all a couple of your shots are out of focus because of low DoF because of your aperture selection, but the majority are simply because you're too close or too far
>>3247931>I suck at focusing loool, what tips do you use to make sure your photo is in focus?Several of these shots didn't need manual focus and would've likely been fine with auto focus
That said, purely experience and practice. Obviously use the VF instead of the live.
If you're shooting the kit 18-55mm then pick one point, say 35mm, and shoot and focus it to death, then try at 50mm
