>>3257341>"litany" and "condemnation" aren't very big words, and they're used pretty darn correctlyI wasn't the guy you're responding to, but no they're not really being used correctly.
The context is
>Jamie's instagram is a litany of condemnation.Litany: a tedious recital or repetitive series.
Condemnation: the expression of very strong disapproval; censure.
So "Jamie's instagram is a litany of condemnation" would mean that her instagram is a repetitive series of her condemning... things. It's not clear from context what that anon thinks she's condemning.
Her instagram is, in fact, a series of photographs. She doesn't even caption them in most cases, much less condemn anyone or anything.
The closest thing I can find to a meaning in that guy's statement is if he means that her instagram is a litany of [self-]condemnation; i.e., that her photographs are a condemnation of her life. Which, okay, maybe, but as
>>3257007 says, that's an extremely clumsy use of the language and smacks of someone trying to use (what they would consider) "big words" to sound more intellectual without really fully grasping their meaning.
