>>3258601its 8 people walking past a van
>>3258604its a guy peering over a wall
>>3258606its people walking past bad modern architecture
>>3258607it's a lesbian walking down the street
>>3258611its an out of focus man walking down the street with bad lens performance
>>3258612its 6 people walking across the street
>>3258613its 5 people walking down the street
>>3258616its a grown man taking an image of two schoolboys walking down the street
>>3258617it's a woman jogging past a tourist attraction
>>3258620its a person in a nice outfit walking in the park photographed poorly from an unappealing distance
>>3258621its a black woman curious why you're taking her picture in the snow, this was the moment you felt you were interacting with someone in a meaningful way. INTERACTION, you thought.
>>3258622and here we have a man walking down the street
>>3258624followed by some jailbait eating on some art that you didn't make
>>3258625and here we have the least interesting photo I've ever seen of a period-ship restoration. bravo.
>>3258626here we have an unengaging sideline shot of a sideline protest that didn't change anything, can't even make her hashtag out at your angle/focusing ability
>>3258628Same as above except one person is engagingwith an expression that seems to be questioning if you're going to approach or just stare at a distance. Missed opportunity for real protest portraiture. Another example where you thought you were connecting but weren't.
>>32586303 men talk behind a hedge at a protest
>>3258633man stares at object out of view
>>3258634unhappy father allows children to climb on him, out of focus
>>3258636woman walks down the street, but at least there's something of interest here; there's motion. This could be a transitory frame between two interesting frames, but it isn't, because...
>>3258638this is a homeless person's back.
Have I made my point? Should I continue?
