>>3267460Holy shit. Is /p/ mainly composed of high school rejects? The educational system has really failed you.
>the point is do you want a lens that has diferent focal lenths to cover a range of situations (sigma zoom) or a prime lens with one focal lenght best suited for wide angles?So you think I need an expert opinion to reveal the fact that a zoom lens that offers an extra 32 points of focal length/fields of view offers more 'utility' and another that is a fifth its size and weight will tilt the scale in favour of 'portability'
I don't give a shit, which is why my only criteria was optics and the resulting image quality. Weight and size don't concern me at all, so I would obviously favour utility if all other things were equal. Which is why i was exclusively interested in optics (ie: if the prime's optics were considerably better, I'd be willing to compromise utility for it). Any fucking 10 year old who is not clinically retarded would have understood this. At least one person already did. You managed to gloss over the only thing I asked about (ie: which one is better optically) by going for "both are good optically". You're illiterate.
I've already received at least one answer that I consider satisfactory, no need to entertain conversation with people who are clearly fucking illiterate and autistic enough on top of that to voice their limited reading comprehension in an aggressive manner. Go back to school.
