>>3266861>take your favourite definition of when two dots are no longer optically distuingishable and just convert you lazy fuckYou can't convert because megapixels is NOT a statement of resolution you ignorant fuck. It is a statement of sensor sampling frequency.
>but muh dxo perceptual megapickles!Most ignorant term I've ever seen from a "testing" web site. You might as well describe car acceleration as "perceptual rpm."
BTW: most lenses can comfortably out resolve today's pixel densities at a contrast higher than MTF10. Today's really good and excellent lenses would benefit on an APS-H 120mp sensor.
