>>3280855>Nikon D3300, D5300, D7000 Pentax K-50, Nex 5n, X-T10, any 16MP MFT etc...>All of them perform better than a 5DIISee, this is why people don't take /p/ seriously. You're comparing consumer level crop and MFT sensor cameras to a pro level full frame camera and declaring, without reservation, that all the consumer cameras just "perform better." Granted, there ARE metrics in which newer consumer level cameras outperform older pro level cameras -- for example the old 5DII sensor was really prone to red banding in lifted shadows, the number of AF points on that camera would now be considered unacceptably low and the presence of an AA filter means it's a tiny bit less satisfying to pixel peep -- but without defining what "perform better" means, you're giving highly misleading advice.
A lot of these cameras, like the D3300, D5300, K-50 and NEX 5n don't even have an acceptable user interface. They lack a top LCD (or alternative) and in the case of the NEX, a traditional mode dial + command dial style interface.
And while the 5DII has an older sensor, most of the cameras you mentioned lose a lot more detail, much quicker, as the ISO is increased. I can almost always spot a telephoto image of wildlife taken on MFT from a glance, due to the inferior image quality.
>>3280867>>3280863The 5D Mark II was a $2400 camera when it was new, so you're NOT going to find a newer generation at the same level of features for $1000 new. The 6D is a very modest step up in terms of sensor performance and a few minor tweaks here and there, but you lose your max shutter speed with the 1/4000 sec cap, you lose the AF point selector joystick, you lose weather sealing and the magnesium body, and the camera has a deliberately gimped AF implementation and only 1 SD card slot despite 2 slots being the prosumer standard at the time it was designed.
You can, however, get a 5D Mark III for around $1100 used.
