>>3285424it's exactly why people who play the violin nearly always sound better than people who play the guitar.
it's simply harder to learn to play the violin, so those who do, put in much more work, have a much better ear, and much more control. while a guitar is much easier to play, so there are many more people who can learn a few chords and strum a stupid song while feeling like they understand, and can play music.
film cameras just require much more insight and foreknowledge into how a camera works, and thus, typically, also includes much more knowledge of lighting, composition etc (exceptions abound, but only prove the rule).
whereas digital even for "professional" camera is essentially point and shoot. you basically get a lot more bullshit garbage, and less carefulness.
because film stock gets expensive, whereas digital is nearly free, post cost-of-entry.
in the 90s and 80s recording time in a music studio could be in the 1,000-100,000 per day, just to rent the space and use the equipment. Now, that's easily the cost of studio itself, and many famous songs have been made on essentially macbooks, a computer that college freshman use to word-process their shitty anthropology 101 paper.
3d printing (god forbid it ever happens), would equate to the same thing, only the garbage would be physical.
