>>3289108I know very well how hard it can be to go out hiking with all your gear, what camera did you use? Maybe (if you have a little bit more time, because such natural phenomens are quickly gone) try to get a different composition. It feels a bit tight cropped, but maybe this is what you were looking for.
>>3289079>>3289048>>3289047>>3289045>>3289043>>3289020Photographing statues can be fun and everything, but you could try including them with your surroudings. Like photographing art which someone else made is not my thing, but giving it a bit more deepnes by including people from the area can be interesting. (rest are snapshits)
>>3289000silky water is nice to look at sure, but has been done a million times. You could also try to include more of your surrounding, which will work just fine when you just get a wide angle lense. Maybe try out the Sigma 17-50mm f.2.8 (really fun lense to use)
>>3288993This is something my father would tell me to photograph (he is 70). Beautiful sky and everything, but without anything else to tell. No foreground, no peopl,e buildings, mountains or trees. I couldn't tell if this one was taken in spain, germany, or any other country.
>>3288992A bit too tryhard (especially for such an expensive cam)
>>3288812unrealistic red (as other anons pointed out already)
>>3288778>>3288776>>3288773>>3288771No offence, but i will never understand why people take close ups of flowers. Sure i know jackshit about some artistic aspects of photography and i understand that every genre has it's place, these shots don't tell me anything. Well the leaf closeups are really nice in my opinion, but from a biological standpoint
>>3288620Well shoot lighttrails at night, sunset or sunrise, but please not during such abright time of the day, especially without a filter (also crooked pics are shite)
>>3288614I like the portrait, even if it seems a bit tightly croped
>>3288606>>3288611>>3288629please straighted your pics
