>>3292328As a fellow Fuji owner, I have noticed Fujiite combativeness. They are much more vocal than the Pentaxians about their delusions of the perfection of their cameras. They are mostly triggered when someone lies about the flaws of their cameras, but sometimes, legitimate criticisms of Fuji cameras can set them off too. Here are a few legitimate complaints I've noticed with the hardware:
Raw files: Overall, while it's not a huge inconvenience and a properly sharpened X-trans image can look really nice (there is no AA filter, after all), I think most Fuji shooters would prefer their cameras to have Bayer-array, AA-less sensors. Summed up:
>extra step to convert files to .DNG before they may be processed in Lightroom>rendering of foliage and certain repeating textures can be ugly (so-called Fuji worms)Lenses: There are some great Fuji lenses, but because the emphasis of the company shifted with the release of the X-T1 from street and portrait shooting to now being a full featured DSLR replacement, the lineup of lenses has ended up fairly unbalanced, which users notice. Summed up:
>high prices compete well against Leica, but won't win any DSLR users on price alone>few appealing telephoto lens options>lenses >60mm tend to be larger than counterparts with other systems>early generation lenses have not been updated with the weather sealing or faster AF motors used in more recent designsBodies: The technology seems to be more oriented toward system coherence than offering the cutting edge of everything, so they didn't offer IBIS, for example, until they could be sure that they could build sturdy body with a shutter mechanism that would not induce any shutter shock, but meanwhile they didn't bother to update the 24 MP sensor used in that camera. Additionally,
>quite a few reports of QC and durability problems with X-T2>sometimes the firmware can be buggy, necessitating removal of the battery to reset the camera>prices seem high for being "just APS-C" 
