>>3301007Everything from color to framing to subject is just fantastic. The exposure is perfect. The deep focus was an intelligent move. The colors are very pastel, I like the blue in the shadows, intentional or not. Only complaint is that I would have taken a second shot of this scene with a longer exposure (and if this is digital, lower ISO) and seen if it fixed your noise problem. If film, if early in the roll I would’ve sacrificed earlier shots and pulled a stop.
>>3301009Nice deep focus again, but a bit too deep. My eyes aren’t sure where to look. Decent composition slightly marred by details that are TOO sharp.
>>3301011I would’ve gone wide open or at least wider open on this one. I think you were going for a sort of vertigo and the focus is way too deep for that. I would have slid the lens all the way to infinity, not even hyperfocal with infinity in the depth of field but pure infinity, and gone f/4 or faster, maybe even f/2. Would draw the eyes closer to the bottom of the elevator shaft and give a stronger sense of depth perception.
>>3301012Eh, cool angle, but at the end of the day it’s stairs. Has that sort of f/8 look and banal subject I would expect to see on a Ken Rockwell review of some $6000 lens on his M7.
>>3301013Sorry, this just doesn’t seem to have any interesting compositional thought behind it. Looks like a thoughtless snapshot of a messy scene.
>>3301015I like this. Did you shoot one straight on too? This one is like 10 degrees from being perpendicular to the holes. I think it’ll be better like it is here, but curious to see how straight on would’ve looked.
>>3301017Too low contrast and dark. Too wide of an angle. Pretty poor framing. For shots like these, my first instinct would be to not take them, it if I did I’d put my subject in the middle or crop afterwards.
>>3301019Liking the colors
>>3301020Lemme guess, you wanted to show off your widest rectilinear Lens. Nice find, boring shot.
