Bridging the gap

>Are large sensor bridge cameras going to win in the future?

Back in 2010 I was insistent that bridge cameras like the Fuji S100fs were the best option for an all emcompasing camera. I only upgraded to the Fuji HS10 because I wanted more zoom and HD recording.

Then I finally learned why my photos sucked and what it would take to get what I lacked. Sensor size.

In 2012 I went after a Canon 60D. At first I was disappointed with the color saturation, the camera was way too heavy, the kit lens was too limited, and cost of replacement too high to take risks with.

Then last year I came to a realization. Mirrorless cameras are a middle stage.

More people are taking photos with their cell phones which has much of the world watching digital images rather than pass-through photons. The advantages are seeing the actual end result, however the disadvantages are in focus, sharpness, and how convenience produces lax attitudes about skill.

So I picked up a couple old Nex cameras and got a couple lenses. So far I am very happy with the quality of images, the ease, and portability. I do however seem to have more images that are not as usable just like I did with the Fuji bridge cameras. Despite screen resolution, its just impossible to perfect the focus and assure the detail of the image.

Nevertheless, I see a trend. There are more pocketable cameras today that have 1" sensors than in the past.

I tend to keep the 18-200 on my Nex

I still use a Fuji HS50EXR from time to time because of ultimate versitility

I also got a Panasonic ZS60 for pocketable 30x reach.

I have in total about 50 cameras of various types. From camcorders to DSLRs to PNS to bridge superzooms.

I dont think it will be long and we will see small form large sensor superzoom cameras with phone connectivity becoming a norm for photogaphers.

Seriously, lets discuss this.