No hard feelings but let’s be abrasive about your photos
>>3331731Baby’s first thin depth of field
>>3331732Baby’s second one. Better but doesn’t have any compositional draw
>>3331736A cat. A pretty one, but they’re surprisingly easy to photograph. A decent pic but nothing interesting beyond personal value imo
>>3331738Baby’s third thin depth of field, baby’s first black and white. Seriously, don’t shoot wide open all the time, try locking yourself at f/5.6 for the next month
>>3331739Baby’s fourth
>>3331741Interesting perspective in the roof but I feel it’s poorly framed and your eyes are just drawn to the edges of the photo
>>3331742For a sunset landscape it’s not very special. Here’s a trick: use a telephoto lens for landscapes.
>>3331744Kitty
>>3331745Decent if soulless and boring architectural shot
>>3331746Baby’s fifth
>>3331748Not bad but I have no reason to look at it again. Pointy composition sure but it’s just kinda pointless compositionally
>>3332186Decent black and white tonality in this one
>>3332187Wish you included more street and less sky
>>3332573Meme
>>3333061Nice moment desu
>>3333062It’s just a fucking duck
>>3333292Japan is cheating
>>3333293Blown out sky. Only acceptable on slide film desu
>>3333294Decent perspective, but japan is cheating and I bet you $100 this shot was taken exactly like this before you took it
>>3333382Just a lot of grey desu
>>3333386Boring shapes
>>3333389Genuinely one of the better ones, but I wouldn’t have put it in 2x3 format, I’d crop to 5x7 or even 4x5
I just realized this isn’t one guys photos so I’m stopping here unless I see something genuinely great below
