>>3333554I agree that landscape photography is "overdone", but I'd say this for almost every genre. I don't think that should make you dismiss it altogether though, and if it does, you probably just aren't attracted to it specifically. Because like music or any other art, a photographic genre has a formula that's successful and since so many people do photography for social media status, not to create high art, there's a reason it looks so repetitive.
>>3333677Google is not a good place to search for unique landscape photographs. It's looking for things based on the most relevant and most popular, and it's used by people who want to find quick stock photos for powerpoint presentations (I've actually gotten the feedback in the past, when doing a presentation, that some of my images weren't "relevant enough" and "didn't make them think of a [landscape, whatever] that much".
If you want to find more unique photography anywhere you're probably going to have to go an art gallery for look at photography books at the library or book store. You could also take a look at New Topography, though that's a tough one because technically that's the name of a decades old art show, not a genre, and in today's world is not as groundbreaking (photographs of a man altered landscape) as it used to be.
