>>3346004The photos above don't have any life, they're just buildings or objects.
It tells me nothing about the photographer or the subject or their life, or lens they see thourgh, and if it is it's a bird or some kind of wildlife I can see outside, or google myself. It's not exciting it's the blandest part of life.
I live down the street from a cinemark, why are you taking a picture of something of something that's in almost every town in America? I can't even see the shity slender man, becuase you don't frame the subject in enough light. Then the one with the rockstars, I don't care becuase I don't enjoy rock or know the artist so I don't care. To me it looks like the millions of others rock and concert photos that litter instagram.
The lens of the photographers do nothing exciting and are the most clean, and simple, unexciting photos. What's the point of taking pictures if you're gonna take pictures of the most boring parts of life. In the most clean un interesting way possible.
There's no personality or voice in any of these.
There's no emotional weight or detachment. There's no soul or life in those photos. They're so mundane and devoid of anything interesting. What's that saying the camera takes your soul?
These photos looks like what happens when you give an 8 year old and her suburban mom cameras after a photography class at the local YMCA
Okay here's an example of a photo I like and think is good, I can explain what I like and what makes it good but I already feel like I'm giving a photography class
