>>3334824since you're getting a shit ton of conflicting and down right silly advices:
a. i'll assume were talking digital
b. i'll take for granted mm markings on op pic are full frame equivalent. you half the focal range to get m43 full frame equivalent, and divide by roughly 1/6 to get apsc equivalent. correct ranges are slightly more complicated at apsc since there apsc sensor sizes can vary in size:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APS-C#Multiplier_factorsc. 200mm is a bit long for portraiture, you'll get camera shake, even atmospheric distortions, and you'll have to be quite far from the subject, regular portrait lenses tend to go from 50mm to 150mm ff equivalent. time tested norm with a reason, but whatever, we'll look at 200mm lenses.
e. you're searching for 200mm full frame lens, 125mm apsc lens, 100mm m43 lens.
f. you're obviously clueless so fuck it and go with
>>3334914, it's zoom lens, meaning it has full frame ranges from 128mm to 320mm, you won't throw a lot of cash away. cam won't be giving you stellar pictures, but it's a good learning kit. you'll still get good subject separations despite what that other silly individual is telling you. lenses at longer focal lengts get pretty good dof from distance alone. Lenses with low apertures are a bonus, will be even better at separation, but they come with hefty price.
extra: there's a shit ton of cameras out there, nobody will be able to give you a list of what's best even if you completely narrow things down. prices drop daily, and vary extremely on used market, so just know that you really can't go that wrong no matter where you turn. cameras aren't phones, they won't suddenly break on you, and even ten year old camera can make good pictures.
