>>3343626>adapterAdapters are shit and only used out of necessity.
>cheapIt's $1000
>50/1.2 and 35/1.2 are nicheThey released a 35mm and a 50mm lens, so the focal lengths are definitely not niche and 1.8 at this price is just bad.
>it's not wise to invest everything in something unproven Once again all it took was a lens with macro and a bit more range. That's hardly "investing everything". And their cashflow has been decreasing ever since the A7 series was introduced.
>if the new product doesn't take flight, the whole company could be ruinedTheir old product line is end of life anyway so their only future lies in mirrorless. It's definitely not going to take flight if they half ass it though.
>how many lenses did sony fe start with5.
>C and S in this contex are the same in my languageI'm sorry but this is an English speaking forum and this is irrelevant. My first language isn't English either, but I respect the community enough to speak their language properly.
>you've lostIf you truly believed this you wouldn't feel the need to keep repeating it. It doesn't matter how smart you think you are or how good you think this launch was, business doesn't exist without customers and Nikon is going to lose even more customers than they already have to Sony, and maybe even Canon. Sony or Canon users who switch to Nikon Z are going to be nearly nonexistent.
>I'm not an IndianNor am I an american.
>racist fuckfaceNature is racist, anon.
>I wouldn't even visit your shithole country for free.That's just dumb. The only country that's legitimately better than Australia is Switzerland. Unless you're swiss you're just deluding yourself.
>how's your perfect english nowIt's almost as if there was a difference between a phone keyboard typo and not knowing the spelling of words.
>how ironicWhat's ironic is you starting shit and posting a reply equivalent to "ur dumb and I'm smart" in broken english, then acting all offended for being called out for it.