>>3366337wish there was a bit more punch in the sky, but it's a nice subject. i'm always a sucker for nice metallic tones
>>3366346very nice
>>3366350>>3366351i like the idea but these don't quite pop enough for it to work. curious what a shallower dof would look like
>>3366358it's an absolutely killer subject, you need to do more to exploit it, get close my man.
>>3366360the colour is interesting but missing focus on the tree kills it completely. it sticks out like a sore thumb
>>3366410key point of interest in the architecture seems to be the pillars which are too obscured. it's probably not easy to take a fantastic shot of the building beyond something simple and documentary, but it needs some scale and some cleaner composing imo
>>3366414the cloud is lovely, and the shoreline coming in makes for a good leading line, but the hint of sun in the lower right and the hint of the town in the lower left feel like distractions. I imagine you had to pull the shadows like fuck, but the middle of the frame got really muddy. this might have needed a couple of frames to composite and even out the tones.
>>3366449light's harsh, orange shirt dude is distracting rather than contributing, and it all looks too soft which may just be the lens you had available. not a bad location though, i'd lurk it more.
>>3366451too busy, clutter like that might need some of the street below for a proper perspective of the scale. as it is you've got a streetlight surrounded by crap.
>>3366453i like the intention but no one in the frame is capturing my interest. needs to be a bit more minimal.
>>3366455haze here is killing you, if there's a way to get soft light hitting the coastline it'd do you a lot of favours. needs a splash of colour.
>>3366461nothing of interest is in focus
>>3366611>>3366613i happen to love minimalist bullshit but neither of these do anything for me
>>3366617lotta wasted space here, if your intended subject was the square foundation thing
