>>3370383>take expensive film out of refrigerator>check expiration date on fridge filmOkay? this isn't an issue. If you have like 10 year old film then yes but it's your fault for buying expired film or not shooting it for 10 bloody years after expiration date. EVEN SO if it was refrigerated for that whole time it's still going to turn out fine.
>take a picture with my film camera>hope it came out okbeing this insecure with your ability to photograph
>have to finish out the entire rollIf you're that anxious about getting the pictures out of your camera rewind the roll there and then, continue shooting, or shoot your cat when you get home.
>have to carry pockets full of film wherever I goI take maybe 2 extra rolls with me and get through maybe a 2 in a day doesn't take up that much space
>what is a bag>have to either send them off to be developed (expensive and shitty quality control) or self develop (expensive to get started, time consuming)Shoot digi if this is an issue. Nobody who shoots film complains about this.
>buy expensive scanneronly if you don't get scans from a lab. Scanners aren't expensive anywhore.
>scan niggatives can agree but not having to do any post processing it great.
>still have some retard with a shit quality monitor look at photos and complain about the colors because on their end it looks badWho cares it's some retard on the internet
>inferior sharpness as well but due to sunk cost fallacy feel as though this is SUPERIOR TO DIGITAL Funny how sharpness is the decisive factor on whether a photo is shit or not. Funny how large format is still the standard for archival because of it's detail/sharpness compared to every other format.
What I don't get is why digifags always think the internet is the final frontier for any image, taken on digital or film. They never print their work
