>>3371231>So you only like photography that involves using specific tools and processes? You hate the current state of photography because it doesn't involve a darkroom?>I hate the current state of photographyNot my words that was the other anon. Liking one things =/= hating another thing, I've never once said anything on the lines of "digital is fucking shit" or "the current state of photography is shit" (I was agreeing with darkroom process point not the state of photography point). I prefer the darkroom process because of the stranglehold of technology on todays society, being a Gen Z'er I've grown up in the internet boom/technology boom, I like having a hobby that doesn't rely on a screen as I spend most of my time on one.
>You failed to have an opinion on actual photography, you only presented one on the thing you do AFTER you photographYou do understand that the definition of Photography includes the taking and processing of an image right? I've stated previously in this thread why I like to photograph (
>>3370222) and I was just acknowledging the other anon for their point.
>You don't like photography, you're just a special kind of gearfagStill have no idea why you're reaching so hard to convey some random person on the internet as a gearfag when there's LITERALLY people who replied to this thread saying they like photography for the gear.
So why do you unironically like photography? You seem to like giving your opinion on other opinions but not giving your own opinion on the actual subject at hand.
