>>3371903Are these all gonna be centered, symmetrical geometric compositions? I understand taking one every now and then, but a whole series of it? Zzz.
>>3371904Is this the same building as in the previous pic? With almost the same structure? Make up your mind, pick one
>>3371906Manages to be both static AND unbalanced. Open window bottom left is the only heavy black around, nothing to balance it on the right.
>>3371907White with a hint of orange, links to the cigarette butt. Would be alright connecting two other photos showing something other than an empty wall. On its own, eh.
>>3371909What makes these lines different from any other line on any other field? What made it stand out for you? I'm not arguing this might be interesting to you, but how are you gonna express that? In addition, vertical is on one quarter, horizontal at half. Having this kind of even number, symmetrical subdivisions kills any dynamism an image could have. Was it your goal? To have the three green areas the same size? Are you trying to tell us nothing happens, everything stands still in Gotland?
>>3371910Taking a picture down a road gives you all kinds of convergence lines which, in this case, point to a big fat nothing. Yellow car is the most colorful thing around, is the focal point. Doesn't relate with the rest of the scene at all. Except the yellow of the leaves, which is a very faint relation, and doesn't add to the image.
>>3371911Another central, symmetric composition with an asymmetric component (red doors) that's unbalanced. Lazy attempts to cram everything into symmetry.
>>3371912It's the sea. Ratios half and quarter, already discussed what I think of it.
>>3371913A fucking fence. With a colored rectangle. And a lamppost. And some unidentified junk sticking up. All in the far left. Nothing on the right.
>>3371915Is "Dead-Pan" the film that makes everything look lifeless?
On a good note, there's tastefully little photoshop involved.
