>>3382840>You do not get to gloss over the socialist aspects just because they were fascistt. man who hasn't spent even a single minute of his life educating himself about politics, and is proud of it
call socialism evil or whatever you want, but in any world where words have meaning a socialist fascist is a complete oxymoron.
I don't expect you to pick up a copy of Robert Paxton's An Anatomy of Fascism but at least look up the fucking words, brain genius. Rabid anti-leftism is an inherent part of fascism, it's part of what makes fascism fascism. See Hitler, Mussolini for practical examples.
You can't just say "nah, to me fascism just means violent men in suits, so leftists can be it too", words have meaning otherwise they're useless. Socialist fascists or fascists socialists do not exist. They're inherently conflicting ideologies, regardless of whether you think either's good or bad. Grouping all things you don't like together is toddler-tier politics.
>>3382841>The bigger the government, the more taxes, the more far left you are.I just named examples of political movements on the left that explicitly argue against the existence of a government, but here you go again with this dumbass "left means big gov" shit.
Wanting all "unjustified" power structures gone, including the government, is literally the central tenet of anarchism (which, again, is a leftist movement). The abolition of money is part of a whole bunch of leftist ideologies (including anarchism, communism) so "more tax == more leftist" inherently makes no sense either.
Please, people, educate yourself. Please. This is just embarrassing. Is the education system in the US really this deficient?
I'm almost shocked to learn that /p/ knows even less about politics than about photography.
Or is this just /pol/ leaking out of their containment board?
