>>3380987No, blue is the most important channel for b&w, and fuji has less blue than bayer.
>>3380996>prove that green is the lightest of the three coloursErrr, really? Have you tried looking at it?
>prove that taking less samples of red and blue leads to lower colour accuracyHow about the fact there are less samples of the other 2 colours? I take it you can't into basic math.
>but eyeballsEyeballs are subjective, organic and its receptors created through random chance. It has nothing in common with a cmos sensor. The fact that our eyes are made up of 2/3 "red" cones and 2% blue should tell you all you need to know, if it doesn't, please, make a cfa with 66% red, 31% green and 2% blue, and I'll be here to laugh at its abysmal performance.
>i can't see any sensor expertsWell, luckily for you i have a bsc in wave physics, and all colour really is, is wiggly light.
>>3381081Wow, you're a dense faggot, if you use colour profiles you get a consistent colour output from all your gear, so any presets you make work exactly as intended. Fucking hell it's amateur around here rn.
>>3381105No worries, i gave the actual distribution and bayer is still closer, even though it highlighted the stupidity of your request.
>>3381112Nice samefagging
>>3381113Not angry, i just don't like when people are lied to.
>clearly you've not seen jason vidsYou mean the ones where dudes pay 10 grand to ogle a semi naked chick? Yes, I'm sure lots of wives give the ok for that one insteadof spending it on your kid. All those dudes are single and rich.
>pic relatedPress photos? Literally the photographic discipline where gear and skill are so unimportant most jp's have been fired and reporters are being told to take photos with their iPhone
>>3381114>blow up to 400%Nah fuji colour problems are easily seen in finished shots, u may just not have the experience needed to see them yet
>>3381133we use green as it lets through the most light
