>>3380853if the rocks were your subject I think you missed focus.
>>3380854could've been interesting with different framing. as it is the lines don't lead, and the whole thing is off balance.
>>3380857this one is kind of nice, but also seems a little dull... no clear subject. it would've been nice if you did something with the rock with the birds, or gotten lower and matched the rock to the left with the horizon. unto itself it is kind of uninteresting.
>>3380858work with the horizon or frame it so the rock is isolated in the water. I think that would have worked better imo
>>3380872this is nice but a bit heavy on the pp.
>>3380873I like this one better, but feel that you missed the focus here. I imagine the subject is the bridge and not the tree in the foreground. next time consider getting rid of that foreground element entirely. I mean it *works* but the shot is too left heavy as it is. good shot though.
>>3380878this is pretty good. I love how you highlight the relation between the sea level and the pier/buildings in the back.
>>3380879another great shot, really like the combination of the surfer and the silhouette of the life-guard in the "tower". this photograph speaks well for the experience/time it was taken in. good job, imo.
>>3380933good balance of elements, also technically it's sound, but it doesn't say much. it is pleasant looking though.
>>3380935concertphoto/10. this one is a nice capture since they're all kind of in sync with their heads down. the others you've posted are far less interesting and snapshitty.
>>3380960it's quite interesting, but it's a shame the quality of the image is kind of crap. overprocessed.
>>3380982the photo is good, but the expression your model conveys is lifeless, and says nothing at all. if that was your intention then, I guess fuck me.
>>3380983really cool. don't really have much to add to this. except maybe you've killed the greens a bit?
