>>3389599>How do they get so popular with this?It's an eyecatching heavily edited image with an emotional appeal (or inside joke in this case) on a social media platform. What's to stop it being popular?
>Seriously what am I missing here???You seem to have false expectations of instagram catering to your needs of skilled photography instead of being a social media platform for mobiles. Or you're baiting for effect.
>>3389606>>3389613>>3389619Can't tell whether you're pretending to be retarded or are actually retarded. Either way the outcome is the same
Sagey sage sage
>>3389668It's also why back-to-the-cam shots do so well on social media. Conversely, all of these kinds of techniques fare poorly in print/galleries outside of magazines because you're geared towards studying the image in detail, which these shots obviously purposefully lack
In short, complaining about seeing popular images and accounts on platforms that are specifically geared towards those kinds of images and accounts is at best bad trolling and slightly mentally deficient
