>>3397351If it isn't doing what you want it to do, or is a pain to use, then go ahead and upgrade. Those really are the only considerations that should go into upgrading or buying any new camera equipment.
>>3397427They're fine up to a point, the D90 has an older sensor with low resolution and the D3200 has an older sensor with 24 MP which doesn't make for the best low light performance compared to others. The main issues with the D3200 are that
>you have to menu dive to change a lot of settings>the viewfinder and overall body are smaller>the AF is not very fast and struggles in low light>build quality is not that great, it can break easier or also let in water much easier than higher end bodies>old lenses can't AF on this body, and because of the tiny viewfinder and lack of DoF preview button, it would be way too much of a pain to manually focus on this thingThe above are less of issues on the D90, but that thing is a fucking dinosaur. Yeah, you can get "good shots" on it, I won't say otherwise, but I wouldn't criticize anyone who wants something newer as well.
If you want a real "upgrade" I'd look at something like a D7200, or Canon 70D. A T3i is basically the same thing you have now, with a flip out screen. Also consider lenses, mainly primes like the 35 1.8 DX, 50 1.8G or 85 1.8G since they're not too expensive and deliver very high image quality, and you can carry them forward to other bodies (unless you go FX, the 35 1.8 DX would have cropped corners on an FX body)
