>>3417468>>3417244oi anons no offense but srsly what kind of criticism do you hope of receiving? Your pages are 90% shameless selfies and 10% iphone snapshits.
Now I ain't sayin that's a crime, but /p sure ain't the place for that basic crap. If follower's what you crave hopping over to /soc, investing in a bot or just hashtag spamming would be much more efficient than posting here.
You seem to lead interesting lives with great photog potential so if ye really seek feedback/improvement, first go buy a cheap analogue slr or an entry level dslr and come back with sth worth talking about.
>>3405130I like how you play with light, keep going in that direction desu.
>>3405130I usually get bored quickly of this kind of shots but your compositions are breathtaking, sharp, carefully colour corrected and balanced. big props
>>3417434>>3417560Beneath his cuntish hissy fit, anon is giving you proper advice. Personally, I dun reckon your snaps are unacceptable, tho I hate to admit that 80% of it is highly cringy. If you want to focus on portraiture and models, auto mode isn't gonna cut it. Brush up on composition and framing, learn how to work with light instead of relying solely on post.
Also learn how to work and be selective with models. Friends and acquaintances don't always make interesting subjects, especially if you put them in generic model scenarios they're not fit for. If you wanna keep on shooting friendos maybe you should try to portray more intimate moments with them instead of phoney and trite park shootings.
If you're not too lazy to google dem basics and watch a couple of youtube tutorials, you should see great improvements in ur pics.
>>3415652your feed is positively bonkers and I dig that.
you should totes go back to digital or even analogue tho, leave polaroid shots for more specific themes. I'd normally also hint towards better feed curation yet, in a weird way, I see order in your chaos.
(+++mad bonus points for your mixcloud page and handle)
