/p/ - Photography » Thread #3404362

[47 / 10 / ?]

2MiB, 1920x1080, Screenshot_20181210-131201.png

Canon users EXPOSED and cucked

Anonymous Mon 10 Dec 2018 12:20:49 No.3404362 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>3404366 >>3404374 >>3404379 >>3404381 >>3404389 >>3404390 >>3404405 >>3404425 >>3405171 >>3406590 >>3410447 >>3410453 >>3410472

>1500 photographers
>fanbois thought canon, fuji or nikon had the best color science
>blind poll
>sony actually rekt everyone

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot_20181210-131451.png, 2MiB, 1920x1080

Anonymous Mon 10 Dec 2018 12:22:24 No.3404363 Report

Quoted By: >>3405177

(number of best picture pucks - number of worst picture pics= total score)

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 10 Dec 2018 12:29:44 No.3404366 Report

Quoted By:

>>3404362
don't make me bring your snaphits out of your book again tony

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 10 Dec 2018 12:39:35 No.3404368 Report

Quoted By:

>This thread is sponsored by Sony
Or is it just poopchute wanking into his coffee mug again

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO TNxKZI3.png, 184KiB, 800x800

Anonymous Mon 10 Dec 2018 12:47:48 No.3404371 Report

Quoted By:

Everyone, you all have a good camera and your talents and skills at photog and post are what counts the most for having a good photo, not the opinions of others or numbers on a chart.

Remember, the one you have with you.

That is all.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 10 Dec 2018 12:49:22 No.3404374 Report

Quoted By:

>>3404362
Oh what a surprise, the market leader is leading the market.

Why are people still surprised sony have the best products?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 10 Dec 2018 13:09:56 No.3404379 Report

Quoted By: >>3404391

>>3404362
The key takeaway of the experiment/video is that the difference is tiny and any preference for one brand over another evaporates immediately when you do even the tiniest bit of postprocessing, yet the Sony fanboys all watch it and interpret it as
>sony actually rekt everyone

This is why everyone hates Sony fanboys.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_6020.jpg, 295KiB, 1000x667

Anonymous Mon 10 Dec 2018 13:16:42 No.3404381 Report

Quoted By:

>>3404362
Why do you watch this freak? Why are you falling for gearfaggotry propaganda? Why the fuck does this even matter in the first place?
Go out and take photos you fucking buffoon.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1502670572171.png, 309KiB, 315x439

Anonymous Mon 10 Dec 2018 13:43:41 No.3404388 Report

Quoted By:

only plebs and Ken shoot jpeg so it doesnt fucking matter

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1507824260005.jpg, 534KiB, 768x1024

Anonymous Mon 10 Dec 2018 13:44:41 No.3404389 Report

Quoted By: >>3404508

>>3404362
We can't let them get away with this. How do we stop Sony.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 10 Dec 2018 13:46:57 No.3404390 Report

Quoted By:

>>3404362
But that’s like your opinion man

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 10 Dec 2018 13:50:10 No.3404391 Report

Quoted By: >>3404426

>>3404379
The feeling is mutual. For years people have told them they have the worst colours, but in blind tests, those same people actually believe these "worst" colours are the best colours.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1537316278616.gif, 27KiB, 24x20

Anonymous Mon 10 Dec 2018 14:09:34 No.3404405 Report

Quoted By:

>>3404362
Jokes on you IM FUCKING COLOR BLIND

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 10 Dec 2018 15:07:04 No.3404420 Report

Quoted By: >>3404424

oh yea, I wasted 30 minutes of my life watching this shit.If anyone's wondering,this test has ZERO (0) scientific backing .I honestly thought this fag would do some proper lab testing.Nope.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 10 Dec 2018 15:10:43 No.3404424 Report

Quoted By: >>3406992

>>3404420
Just because it uses human subjectivity, does not mean his testing was non scientific.

Here's a link to a "scientific" method https://www.pdnonline.com/gear/cameras/the-best-cameras-for-color-reproduction-ranked/ oh what a surprise, sony wins again.

Also, an almost identical test to tonys was partaken by another site, and the results came back the same. So tonys test is repeatable, the cornerstone of any scientific test.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 10 Dec 2018 15:12:36 No.3404425 Report

Quoted By: >>3404431

>>3404362
>you can judge color science with two sets of photos under similar lighting conditions
>tests where you try to fool users by adding false labels are scientific
the absolute state of the sony fanboy

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 10 Dec 2018 15:13:47 No.3404426 Report

Quoted By: >>3404431

>>3404391
In some conditions Sony does have poor colors. It's not all the time and it can be edited, but it happens.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 10 Dec 2018 15:22:35 No.3404431 Report

Quoted By: >>3404536

>>3404426
>sensor that changes how it represents colour based on what mood it is in

Lmfao

Anti sony niggers getting desperate af now.

And no, sony have repeatedly proven they objectively and subjectively have the best colour science.

>>3404425
The test proved many things, as shown in the video, one of the big takeaways was that sony is targeted and hated by some users due to little more than the branding.

It really revealed the absolute state of anti sony sentiment.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 10 Dec 2018 15:55:38 No.3404445 Report

Quoted By:

Just to plug my thread again: if you want to see if you can actually tell the difference between Canon and Sony colors, I’ve got a thread up where I shot variously with a 5D3 and A7II (along with one Nikon d700 shot somewhere in there).

Thread is here: >>3400184

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 10 Dec 2018 17:39:54 No.3404508 Report

Quoted By:

>>3404389
by using the one you have with you

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 10 Dec 2018 18:24:45 No.3404532 Report

Quoted By: >>3404558 >>3404601

>tfw watching this pathetic brandfaggotry as someone who doesn’t use any of these
It’s hilarious and sad

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 10 Dec 2018 18:34:25 No.3404536 Report

Quoted By:

>>3404431
>colors remain identical under all lighting conditions
>one shot tells you everything you need to know about a sensor's color rendition
wew lad

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 10 Dec 2018 19:48:23 No.3404558 Report

Quoted By: >>3404601

>>3404532
It’s equally hilarious and sad as someone who uses all of them.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 10 Dec 2018 21:32:29 No.3404601 Report

Quoted By:

>>3404532
>>3404558
Feels the same here for someone who only two of those brands now
brandfaggotry is cancer

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 11 Dec 2018 18:27:23 No.3405171 Report

Quoted By: >>3405175

>>3404362
considering sony lenses cost 3x as much i would hope so

and yeah, sony and Panasonic have better colours, too bad Panasonic can't get their autofocus working and sony lenses are absurdly overpriced

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 11 Dec 2018 18:32:19 No.3405175 Report

Quoted By: >>3405180

>>3405171
Some lenses are worse than others.

The new 24GM is a pretty good price compared to its peers.
People expected it to cost 1800 or 2000 when it turned out to be just 1400.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 11 Dec 2018 18:33:34 No.3405177 Report

Quoted By:

>>3404363
Canoncuck here, i would buy a sony except they are so much more expencive, and at the time i started buying into a system they didn't have the same features as the canon. maybe when i want to upgrade from crop to full frame and 4K video

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 03-kanye-west-donald-trump-2016- (...).jpg, 1MiB, 1548x1024

Anonymous Tue 11 Dec 2018 18:36:15 No.3405180 Report

Quoted By: >>3405183 >>3405185

>>3405175
>just 1400.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 11 Dec 2018 18:41:48 No.3405183 Report

Quoted By: >>3405834

>>3405180
Yes, quality comes at a price.

name a better 24mm f1.4 for less money.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 11 Dec 2018 18:42:09 No.3405185 Report

Quoted By:

>>3405180
High end lenses are like this. The cost of precision optics, and there is a lot of optics that is discarded during quality control as well.

It's not unusual to see 3000 dollar Canon lenses either. That level of pricing will probably shock you to death.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 12 Dec 2018 17:49:40 No.3405834 Report

Quoted By: >>3405836 >>3406288

>>3405183
Sigma 1.4 A
>inb4 muh dock

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1537472197945.jpg, 252KiB, 1014x570

Anonymous Wed 12 Dec 2018 17:53:00 No.3405836 Report

Quoted By:

>>3405834
It is cheaper, but a worse lens.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 13 Dec 2018 11:02:32 No.3406288 Report

Quoted By:

>>3405834
>isn't as good mtf performance.
>weighs 50% extra
>stupidly big filter compared to sony

Literally the only thing sigmas got going for it is price

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Nothing But Trash.webm, 3MiB, 480x360

Anonymous Thu 13 Dec 2018 23:55:54 No.3406590 Report

Quoted By: >>3406992

>>3404362
>no color checker involved

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 14 Dec 2018 20:25:21 No.3406992 Report

Quoted By:

>>3404424
/rekt
>>3406590
do you include color checker in every photo you take, retard?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Dec 2018 13:23:17 No.3410447 Report

Quoted By: >>3410456 >>3410503

>>3404362
>see tony northrup a couple of times on /p/
>decide to watch a video of his
>"just like the Naikon d-"
>close video

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Dec 2018 13:49:56 No.3410453 Report

Quoted By: >>3410455

>>3404362
How the fuck is this a question? They're all black!

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Dec 2018 14:06:12 No.3410455 Report

Quoted By:

>>3410453
I enjoyed this comment.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Dec 2018 14:06:35 No.3410456 Report

Quoted By: >>3410503

>>3410447
pronouncing nikon correctly is for the wapanese and japanese only
be a real american and pronounce it naikon

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Dec 2018 14:49:01 No.3410472 Report

Quoted By:

>>3404362
>Northrup
Sega

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Dec 2018 16:04:39 No.3410503 Report

Quoted By: >>3410529

>>3410447
>>3410456
FUN FACT: Nikon is pronounced differently depending on location. It doesn’t mean one nation pronounces it wrong and one pronounces it right, it just means that the name has multiple different pronunciations.

America pronounces it differently from the U.K. which pronounces it differently from France which pronounces it differently from Japan, etc. If you watch commercials straight from Nikon for a given region, they’ll pronounce it with that region’s pronunciation.

So if you think tony Northrop pronouncing it that way is “wrong”, you’re not only a pretentious jackass, you’re also factually incorrect.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Dec 2018 17:27:49 No.3410529 Report

Quoted By: >>3410557

>>3410503
To say it a little cheekily: just because something's right doesn't mean it's not wrong.

Nikon using different pronounciations for different regions to make it easier to promote the brand doesn't mean the pronounciation is what it was supposed to be when the company was founded.

The file type .gif being pronounced "jif" is just horribly wrong though.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Dec 2018 18:20:43 No.3410557 Report

Quoted By:

>>3410529
>The file type .gif being pronounced "jif" is just horribly wrong though.

Low quality bait.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Dec 2018 18:24:33 No.3410558 Report

Quoted By: >>3410567

are they looking at raws or in-camera jpgs though?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Dec 2018 18:39:41 No.3410567 Report

Quoted By: >>3410617

>>3410558
Here’s the actual video.
https://youtu.be/EMfCDujQywY

In it, they explain pretty clearly that any changes in colors from editing—eg, changing the white balance at all—will swamp any differences in color science in a blind poll. So the “Sony wins!” narrative that every sony partisan has been pushing only applies to unedited jpegs straight out of the camera.

It’s a valid result to say that Sony doesn’t have bad color science, and that others don’t have better color science, but saying “sony rekt everyone” implies that the op either didn’t actually watch the video or is just a complete moron who can’t comprehend the slightest of nuances.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Dec 2018 21:05:33 No.3410617 Report

Quoted By: >>3410618

>>3410567
you know, every time I look at dpreview's comparison tool, the only thing that strikes me is that all the sensors look the same.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Dec 2018 21:08:14 No.3410618 Report

Quoted By:

>>3410617
Yep. You can generally see an ISO noise difference between major sensor size differences, but that’s pretty much it. That’s why I’ve been preaching for years that things like usability and cost are vastly more important than things like color science or benchmark scores.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches

Canon users EXPOSED and cucked