>>3410494Much as I'd like to think this is true, a lot of people are willing to pay for garbage. I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic or not, but in case you're not: you're greatly underestimating just how much a lot of people look past bad IQ, bad composition, bad framing, bad post processing, bad everything because they don't really "get" photography. I'm talking about the kinds of people who think HDR tone-mapping and over-saturation looks good.
>inb4 u mad u not successful hurr durrAgain, you wish, it'd be really nice and convenient if financially successful photographers were all good, and that no bad work ever got rewarded, but that's no the case and you know it. Doesn't mean it's true of all, but still.
