Alright, let's feedback some shit.
>>3415086Not sure if you didn't straighten it on purpose or what. It's a cool setting, with some good people walking around in it. Seems like a comfy shot but it doesn't quite do it for me. I tried fucking around with it for fun. At the very least, you should try to straighten it and crop it down a bit.
>>3415068Ah, so you saw that picture with the stoplights in the country or something and thought you'd give it a shot? The effort is there but it's not quite the same. You've got a bit of a blown out look going and your ISO isn't actually as high as I thought but it's up there lol. I'd say you should try this again but position yourself/tripod/whatever a bit further away so you're getting more of the lights and surroundings in the shot instead of having the upper right be some grainy night sky.
>>3415058This would be more unsettling, which I would assume you might be going for, if it didn't look like it was taken on a cellphone from 2002. I like your idea but the execution is a bit flawed. Try it again though, I'd love to see this at a higher res.
>>3414872You are right in that this looks like a post tragedy shot lol. It's not a bad shot in and of itself, it's just a touch drab in that there's not a lot going on. Can't be helped though. You have any other shots from this event?
>>3414852I like it and at the same time I don't. I'm a sucker for long exposure shots because I'm actually a 14 year old child who is fascinated by lights for some reason. It just feels like there's something else missing from this shot; I don't know if it's the overhanging trees in 1/3 of the photo or the mostly empty space beneath it.
>>3414807I dunno what this is but I sort of like it.
>>3414801Looks a touch crooked but it also looks mostly fine.
>>3414800I'm garbage at shooting people so I can't really provide a ton of feedback here. I do like the shot though. I do enjoy the guy saying that it doesn't work with a clothed subject though lmao
