>>3420653I started on the a5000 specifically because it has a full rotatable screen. Great cheap as dirt beginner camera
>>3420639>My complaints about Sony go deeper than anything that can be easily ticked off on a feature list.What are they, out of interest? The only valid one I've ever had is the lack of native E and FE lenses
I personally hate Sony as a company and their history has always been the gilette model of giving out cheap equipment but selling expensive as fuck peripherals, and in forcing paywalls (they even tried it on their alpha camera range ffs) but none of this directly impacts me and their cameras are simply the best value there is, particularly mirrorless
>>3420654That's also a fairly valid concern. I've had a sony lens fail on me too, albeit a cheap shitty one
>>3420668>My A6000 can't apply HDR optimisation(shadow recovery) to my Jpeg files if the camera outputs RAW simultaneously.Not him but I've never seen that complaint in my life because it's retarded. If you're that concerned about JPEG filters then apply them in POST
>>3420669>Dude, he's clearly doing a bit, not actually working for Sony. Stop being obtuse.Genuinely hard to tell on /p/ these days desu
There's a samefag playing two people having a sarcastic conversation promoting the 6400 right now and I genuinely can't decide whether it's shilling or not
Anyway, sage goes in all fields boys
