>>3432837How fucking hard can it be to analyse a fucking shot, you know the faster the aperture the more pronounced the bokeh/tighter the dof range is gonna be, and you estimate the stall attendant/shit behind woman is about half a meter so that gives you your dof and thus the f/number.
Then look at the guy's subscriber count and previous videos, has he ever mentioned his equipment? Dies he do unboxings of expensive shit? Does he cheapen out or can he afford expensive stuff due to youtubebux per his sub count?
So now you get lenses in that assumed price range, and now check the video.
Is it just your boring old 1080p or is it also 60fps? Is it in 2.5k, 4k, 8k? Sure he might have downsampled higher footage, but its fucking video, at night, and it looks okay, so he's obviously using something high range.
This narrows it down by a lot.
Now look at yourself: Why do you want to know what he's got? Want it yourself? Have a look at the nifty list you just made of possible shit *he has*, and look for what *you* can afford. Get that, learn it, done.
Now fuck off.
