>>3439512Some of the comments I hear:
>The body is too smallI use a grip, just like you
>Yeah, but it's too small without the gripThen use a grip or cheap extender
>Yeah, but the finger well isn't deep enoughStop white-knuckling your camera
>There isn't enough glassWhat do you need?
>70-200mm f/2.8What do you think this is attached to my camera?
>Yeah, but 400mm f/2.8 isn't provenI love mine
>What about 300mm? I need thatA sigma MC-11 converter works great with Canon glass and will get you by until Sony releases its own 300mm
>Yeah, but what about 200mm f/2?Only the most hardcore diving photogs and wedding photogs use that glass. The rest of us use a 70-200mm
>The banding on silent is awfulIt can be. Take a test shot at the venue, and if you get banding, don't use it.
>Yeah, but what's the point of having it if it doesn't work?It does work, just not in all artificial lighting situations. Do you have the same complaints about the anti-flicker on your camera that doesn't work perfectly under all fluorescent lighting situations?
>Canon/Nikon is what professionals useI'm not professional?
>I didn't say thatSo what are you saying?
>Uhh ...>I could never use anything other than Canon/NikonOK
>I've been using them for X yearsOK
>Canon/Nikon simply makes the best gearOK
>You'd better watch out because Canon/Nikon mirrorless full frames will be amazingOK
>The E-mount diameter is too smallOK
>Canon f/1.2OK
>NoctOK
>Color scienceOK
>Battery lifeOK
>AccessoriesOK
>Weird hotshoeOK
>Blah blah blahOK
