>>3436801>>3436802>>3436804I dig these first three, but they kind of go downhill from there.
The first three have decent subjects and composition. The pic of the dog has a subject but nothing in the way of interesting composition so it just comes off as a snapshot of your dog, no different than you’d get from your cellphone.
The rest look almost random, like you hit the shutter by accident. They either don’t have a subject or have subjects that are uninteresting, and are shot in an uninteresting way.
On a technical note: That camera is ass in low light, and you’re mostly shooting low-light pictures. Maybe invest in a tripod if you want to shoot in the dark so you can do longer exposures, or pick up a cheap flash for that snapshot aesthetic, or just shoot things with more light. Pay attention to where your shutter speed is relative to your focal length—on that camera, you’ll want it to be about 1/(2xFocal); eg, if your lens is zoomed to 25mm, you’ll want to be shooting at 1/50th of a second minimum to keep from having motion blur assuming you and your subject are standing relatively still. It’s certainly possible to take good pics with a lot of motion blur, but you don’t seem to be on the level where you can do that yet.
