>>3439901thanks for taking the criticism well. I was trying to be frank about what you need to improve on, not trying to put you off. keep it up.
>>3439912really soft. lots of chromatic aberration. dig the crazy aspect ratio but in terms of color, light, composition and subject matter it just isn't very engaging
>>3439903soft and grainy but not in a pleasant way, not enough midtones
>>3439917>>3439915learn how to correct your lens distortion
>>3439921well exposed. you have big spots on your sensor, get your camera cleaned or set lightroom to automatically dispose of them
>>3439968>>3439969>>3439970>>3439975cupid, draw back your bow.
also size your photos smaller. 700px is fine for this board, and they'll look a lot sharper.
very well exposed, cupid.
>>3439970this one is boring
>>3439975>>3439969these do a good job of leading my eye
>>3439984don't be a dick anon. provide some decent cc if you're gonna be a dick. at least cupid has a grasp on how to lead their viewer's eye. at least cupid can expose a photo properly. would you care to point out your photos itt so I can offer you some feedback?
>>3439987better
>>3440030very cool
>>3440138fantastic photo. sucks as a thumbnail, not enough whites. top of building is soft, looks like finger oil on the lens. really great composition though
>>3440120 holy hell. I don't even know where to start.
1) decent subject
2) okay composition, watch your framing (too much headroom and poor background elements)
3) poor lighting, too harsh and reflective in the auto glass, awful shadowing
4) what the fuck is happening in the sky? if you're going to shoot a 20 second (!!!!!!) exposure you really need to get a better tripod or a remote trigger because that shake is mad obvious
5) what the FUCK is happening with your crushed-ass blacks around the Saab. did you edit this as a jpg??
6) please shoot w tighter aperture
cute whips tho
>>3440122for the love of god
>>3440123resize your fucking photos heathen
