>>3443859Nope. If I had a monetary interest, the'd give me some "discount code" where I'd get a cut of what you pay. Check out the website, seriously. See if anything I said was inaccurate. I used to promote
Lynda.com because, up until now, that was the best place to learn high quality editing. Now that I found a site that blows Lynda out of the water, I'm excited to tell people about it.
Also all my posts sound scripted. It's how I talk.
So what was I saying, oh yeah: for a limited time get a full access for only $29.99! Don't wait; Act now and receive the ultimate in editing and photography instruction. At
CreativeLive.com, Learning Starts Here!™
>>3443870Well I did intend the sun to be behind them, and I did bounce light back into them by holding out a reflector up and to my right, but that's about all the thought I put into it. The pose and the way they're rim lit just kind of happened. I had never shot with that kind of lighting, so I only had a vague idea what would happen. I was planning to do a lot of retouching to make it look passable (like I always did back then), but it ended up surprisingly pleasant. I actually won "photo of the day" a few times with that image on ModelMayhem, but that's not that impressive lol. Appreciate the kind words.
Anyone else feel like there's no positive feedback that feels more legit than when it comes from /p? I usually don't trust people when they give me compliments in person. Either they don't know anything about photography and would rave about a flower shot, or they do have some knowledge and they just point out the positive to be likable. It's hard to find honest critique, except on /p haha. If something sucks, you guys won't hold back. That's what makes this board so awesome.
