>>3446666missed focus
>>3446699really nice, too bad the waterline isn't straight.
>>3446705too much dynamic contrast, obvious haloing
>>3446740boring
>>3446763nice & cozy, but the facial expression ruins it (if she's not disabled)
>>3446840overdone, overcooked, boring
>>3446843this is better, simpler & the building has interesting texture
>>3446853yes, the lighting is dramatic & nice, would be better with either only one person, or group of three (rule of odds)
>>3446854i dig the edit, but the pose is cheezy AF and the horizon cuts the head
>>3446855booooooooooooring
>>3447003great edit, nice background, nice subject. only things bothering me are the open pockets.
>>3447046underexposed, unbalanced
>>3447047i think that's not a very interesting flower, and the background is too bright
>>3447051it's a cat
>>3447101boring & edit is too obvious
>>3447104too busy, can't find a subject
>>3447105i'm not sure b/w is a good choice for this subject
>>3447138>>3447140>>3447142the subject is cut off by the edge of the frame
>>3447158nice colors i guess, would have worked better if the road was flat
>>3447163boring & soft, could be improved in post
>>3447248nice colors & contrast, angle feels a bit weird
>>3447354no comment
>>3447433this might be a fun feat for yourself, but is in no way impressive or interesting
>>3447483ok? did they lift off at some point?
>>3447489a nice snapshot. interesting building, and i like the edit.
>>3447491not as interesting.
>>3447492kind of funny, kind of sad. nice snap.
>>3447493soft & boring. decent balance. are those street lights? maybe you could focus more on them.
>>3447526it's a cat. nice edit (if any).
didn't realize there were so many posts, i'll need to skip some.
>>3447934>>3448000nice picture, fitting name, and interesting analysis.
