Just my two cents on some of these
>>3450893>>3450898>>3450898Aside from maybe documenting graffiti in a very detached impersonal way, I don't think these images stand on their own.
>>3450901Unfortunately doesn't communicate anything
>>3451015Much better. Composition is well balanced, colours are pleasing and yuo caught the cook looking very focused. Would be a nice addition to their social media/website.
>>3451099I think there's too much going on/too busy to read, but worth revisiting the spot and see what you can get
>>3451217Quite nice. They're pleasantly lit, although their gaze makes me wonder what's on the right of your frame. Feel like it's an incomplete story here.
>>3451262The contrast and vignette are a bit too much for my taste, but the comp is fairly well chosen (apart from the utility pole coming out of the truck). I think a slightly wider comp would have worked better though. The watermark triggers me to no end, but hey, can't blame you for wanting to protect your work. I remember your orange cube in the middle of nowhere image as well.
>>3451275S'aight. Fairly orthodox comp, but works. An even wider pov would've worked better. Having the seat of the bench mark the intersection between the land and water would've probably balanced it out even further. Or maybe it's just that tree bush that's throwing it off a little bit. Also, feel like more tonal distinction between water and sky is needed. Cute image overall though.
>>3451277Sure. Nice environmental portrait.
>>3451338Dutch angles generally cause me seizures, but this kind of works. Kind of. Wish it was symmetrical though. On 2nd thought, I'd rather see it level.
>>3451340Nice tones. If only you had waited 2 more seconds to catch the guy stepping in the puddle. Not only would it make for a more dynamic shot, but placing him slightly to the right would balance the comp and having his silhouette against those lighter tones in the distance would make him pop out even more. But noice.