>>3453699>0.8 of an f stop1 f-stop*, don't be a retard.
>>3453703>every lens>posts example from an ultra compact pancake.Lmao, you're dumb as shit, and here's why, the sony vignettes no more than any other body, if you attach a canon lens it will have the same vignette as on a canon body.
Lens design is a compromise between vignette, compactness and distortion, the 35 2.8 favours the latter 2 at the expense of the first as vignettes are an easy 1 click fix.
>>3453706>show f2 zoomsCanon showed theirs and it's a fucking joke, it weighs more than sonys 70-200 2.8, is 3 times the weight of tamrons 28-75 2.8, it costs more than those 2 combined AND the tamron is sharper at f2.8.
Why would anyone want this lens? In fact for the same weight I can get 8 primes.
>3rd party 70 200Show me that for canons new mount Lmfao.
>>3453713Over 4 stops? Lmfao, that's worse than samyangs 24mm pancake.
>>3453716No one did it before because an f2 ff 24-70 is a dumb idea. No one wants a nearly 2kg standard zoom in a time when one stop really is nothing to worry about.
>sony cannotYou realise that canon lens easily fits within fe mount dimensions, right?
