>>3454151You keep talking about natural selection and then going on about fat people. You clearly don't have congruence here, because your real issue is you think you're entitled to a 10/10 cheerleader. Being fat because you eat shitty food all the time is not the same as having incredibly bad facial features or whatever else could make somebody "genetically unfit".
But it's a moot point. The woman in the OP is not truly ugly. She isn't even fat so I don't know why you keep bringing that up, her face is symmetrical and her teeth look pretty decent, though it's hard to know for sure since it's a low res selfie.
The only thing is she isn't dressed and styled like a 2019 Instagram thot or art hoe, and it's a shame that this is how we expect all women to look. None of that is about genetics, it's all about superficial societal standards. But still, my point all along is that it's possible that she's sweet and has a heart of gold and that's why this man is with her. You of course don't have to date someone like her but come the fuck on, it's hardly damaging society because two people who love each other paired off. Get a grip.
>>3454141I'd say I'm lucky in that I don't care all that much how she appears, I have standards and preferences but it's not as simple as she can't be fat or can't be a certain race or must be a certain height. It's the sum of her parts as well as her personality, just like in photography (this is still the photo board, right?) Not every photo will necessarily look the best using a rule of thirds method of composing just like not every woman has to look and act the same to be attractive.
