>>3457865 No people>>3457866 One people>>3457868 One people>>3457871 One people>>3457877 Two people>>3457879 One peopleI feel like this series would be a lot better if there were exactly one (small) person in each shot. It would give a bit of a where's-waldo level of interest to the shots. As it is, it just kind of looks like you just happened to go out early when there weren't a lot of people around but weren't doing it intentionally.
Another issue I have with this series is that the photos don't have enough variety. The first two (
>>3457865 >>3457866) appear to have been taken from nearly the exact same spot. Why keep both of them? Same with
>>3457868 and
>>3457877, which are pictures of the same spot. And while
>>3457871 isn't the exact same spot, it features that same "Media City Bergen" tower which tells me you didn't walk very far between them.
Finally, the compositions don't really seem particularly well thought out. You say you're going for "Boring architecture dystopian hell", but a lot of the architecture looks kind of interesting to me (e.g.,
>>3457871 and its quaint old-timey iron balcony railings, plus the nice mountain off in the distance). Your PHOTOGRAPHY of the architecture looks boring, though.
If you're going for "Dull, dystopian cityscape", you should really focus in on that conceptually. Maybe get tighter crops on the buildings so it's just the same repeating pattern of their windows or whatever over and over again, ideally looming over a tiny person in frame. This just feels like a bit of a jumbled mess.
