It's incredible how one single faggot can kill a thread. Oh well.
In general as other people have said there's a good engagement with your subjects, something a certain faggot wouldn't know the first thing about.
>>3459763I like how the viewpoint is slightly lower than the subject. Often people never go to the effort of bending their knees, which is a pity as such a small thing can already give a different perspective. A bit lower and the lines of the street would irradiate from the circle of his t-shirt.
>>3459765I know for portraits you usually would choose a normal to long lens, but going a bit wider would give a better sense of the place, which is important as it's people from a specific neighborhood of Paris.
>>3459767It's my favorite of the bunch, I think. The background fills nicely the space, and it's blurry enough to not be distracting. It's slightly mysterious—what are these shapes? Is this his shop? It's a photo that makes me curious and wanting to know more about this person. Too bad it's crooked, which is a problem in
>>3459773 as well
>>3459768>>3459771These have good expressions but the eyes are completely black holes. It's a jarring effect, unfortunately.
>>3459770Out of focus and too empty. The composition would work if you wanted to say that something or someone is missing, otherwise a step to the left would solve the problem.
>>3459771When people are slouching backwards it sometimes make them look fatter. The open jacket contributes to create this widening triangle which adds to the effect. On the other hand, the photo would miss something if we didn't see the dotted suspenders…
>>3459775There's a strong structure with the diagonal line of the faces, but it doesn't add to the photo. The background is very forgettable. The one I like the least.
>>3459779>chrishansen.jpgFirst step to photograph kids is kneeling to their height and you got that. You can scan your negs multiple times to have an analog HDR, to get the eyes lighter.
