>>3463072Not shit but nothing interesting going on. Even just a 30 second exposure would've been enough to give a bit of drama
>>3463074Your subject is the darkest part of the image, your background is in the wrong place (just walking to the other side would've been enough) and you're not low enough
>>3463076The least shit of the three but still technically meh- fix the flare, frame more at the bottom and get a touch wider, play around with your aperture, etc
Your processing isn't letting you down yet so I don't know why people are talking about that- you have plenty you should be working on before worrying about processing
>>3467936Why is she off-centre in the frame? Why is her hair messy, dirty and allowed to ruin the shot? Why is the background so boring? Why is the foreground so boring? Why is her look and pose so awkward?
It just feels more like a bad street shot taken at the wrong time
>>3470652Nothing special but a technically sound, warm photo
>>3470657Highlights blown, processing is absolute shit
>>3470658If you can't even get your subject in focus you need to go back and start with the basics of photography
