>>3468835If you think you've any criticism on the photo, please go ahead and post it, because what you've written is total and complete nonsense. In fact, I'm even doubting you've even managed to write that lot without looking up vid tutorials on first grade art criticism before scrambling together that pièce de résistance of yours. If you manage to pen something of any tangible value to the one you're trying to critique, I'll see no problems with it, if it's not, and I happen to be around to lend my precious gaze on it, I'll point that to you in as constructive disagreement as I could write. It will destroy and shatter your ego, but at least you'll be able to tell your partners children stories of it in your wiser, older, age. If you think it's bad, partaking one word reply, you may do so as well, and I'll have nothing else to add, leaving you to your blissful and childish ignorance. But questioning other peoples taste is at one hand daft, on other hand fruitless, and in the third and most eminent hand, a dangerous endeavour. It indeed is childish, base way of showing your own jealousies. I happen to like that snaek, I am allowed to say so at a whim of my free will, and I accept not to be questioned on that! Or else, be prepared to face my full wrath! So fuck you, with your pretentious bullshit, and your hipster taste, and rather work on your own craft instead. An art is art, a picture is a picture, a taste is taste, to question someone's on autonominous vietnamese basket weaving message board, is perilous endeavour. You never know the entities out there just waiting to devour you. If it required writing a pasta that will hunt your waking dreams, only so that it will cut off your high strung strings on which your ego still tenderly floats, and brandish it and you yourself deep into it's destined fall to the abyss of the nine circles, then so be it!
