>>3478824 I think it's the kind of picture you see once and then forget about (even because they are pretty much all the same, the best you can do is changin location but even if so, not a big deal)
it's photography for instagram/computer.
the only way I see making money out of it is if maybe you trick some wedding couple to shot the sky "to make the sky under which you got married ethernal" or some other bullshit.
about your photos, they are ok for the genre.
